|
|
|
51 |
Ahmed MH et al, 2012: Renal stone disease and obesity: what is important for urologists and nephrologists?
|
|
52 |
Ferreira Cassini M et al, 2012: Lithiasis in 1,313 kidney transplants: incidence, diagnosis, and management
|
|
53 |
Kruck S et al, 2012: Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy
|
|
54 |
Mandal S et al, 2012: Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for inferior caliceal calculus between children and adults: a retrospective analysis-why do results vary?
|
|
55 |
Zhang LJ, 2012: Shock-wave lithotripsy for renal calculi
|
|
56 |
Pirincci N et al, 2012: The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral stones in children
|
|
57 |
Park J et al, 2012: Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for ureteral calculi: a prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes
|
|
58 |
Gecit I et al, 2012: Tissue damage in kidney, adrenal glands and diaphragm following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
|
|
59 |
Resorlu B et al, 2012: Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones
|
|
60 |
Moon KB et al, 2012: Optimal shock wave rate for shock wave lithotripsy in urolithiasis treatment: a prospective randomized study
|
|
61 |
Jia J et al, 2012: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is effective in treating single melamine-induced urolithiasis in infants and young children
|
|
62 |
Chang CC et al, 2012: In Vitro Study of the Revised Ultrasound Based Real-Time Tracking of Renal Stones for Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Part 1
|
|
63 |
Gul U et al, 2012: Do patients on alpha-blockers for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia have better results after shock wave lithotripsy of urinary stones?
|
|
64 |
Hertzig LL et al, 2012: Urolithiasis after ileal conduit urinary diversion: a comparison of minimally invasive therapies
|
|
65 |
Zhou Y, 2012: Reduction of bubble cavitation by modifying the diffraction wave from a lithotripter aperture
|
|
66 |
Riley JM et al, 2012: Stone management for the patient on anticoagulation
|
|
67 |
Rombi T et al, 2012: Socioeconomic evaluation of the treatment of ureteral lithiasis
|
|
68 |
Islam M et al, 2012: Ureteroscopic pneumatic versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower ureteral stones
|
|
69 |
Pearle MS, 2012: Shock-wave lithotripsy for renal calculi
|
|
70 |
Uguz S et al, 2012: Immediate or delayed SWL in ureteric stones: a prospective and randomized study
|
|
71 |
Ng et al, 2012: Hepatic haematoma after shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones
|
|
72 |
Ceban E, 2012: The treatment of the reno-ureteral calculi by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL)
|
|
73 |
Ng et al, 2012: A prospective, randomized study of the clinical effects of shock wave delivery for unilateral kidney stones: 60 versus 120 shocks per minute
|
|
74 |
Acar C et al, 2012: Impact of Residual Fragments following Endourological Treatments in Renal Stones
|
|
75 |
Granberg et al, 2012: Urolithiasis in children: surgical approach
|
|
76 |
Takahara K et al, 2012: Predictors of success for stone fragmentation and stone-free rate after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones
|
|
77 |
Demirbas M et al, 2012: Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: twelve years of experience with 2836 patients at a single center
|
|
78 |
El-Nahas et al, 2012: Are there long-term effects of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in paediatric patients?
|
|
79 |
Anglada-Curado et al, 2012: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi: Improved efficacy using low frequency
|
|
80 |
Ganpule A et al, 2012: Management of urolithiasis in live related kidney donors
|
|
81 |
Yoshimura K, 2012: Editorial Comment to Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi: Improved efficacy using low frequency
|
|
82 |
Onal B et al, 2012: Predictive factors and management of steinstrasse after shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis-a multivariate analysis study
|
|
83 |
Desai MR, 2012: Urolithiasis: newer trends and practice
|
|
84 |
Tiselius HG, 2012: Words of wisdom: Re: Alkaline citrate reduces stone recurrence and regrowth after shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy
|
|
85 |
Niederberger C, 2012: Re: sperm DNA damage and seminal oxidative status after shock-wave lithotripsy for distal ureteral stones
|
|
86 |
Benes J et al, 2012: Biological effects of tandem shock waves demonstrated on magnetic resonance
|
|
87 |
Resorlu B et al, 2012: Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm
|
|
88 |
Lopes Neto AC et al, 2012: Prospective randomized study of treatment of large proximal ureteral stones: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureterolithotripsy versus laparoscopy
|
|
89 |
Bohris C et al, 2012: Monitoring the coupling of the lithotripter therapy head with skin during routine shock wave lithotripsy with a surveillance camera
|
|
90 |
Polat F et al, 2012: Safety of ESWL in elderly: Evaluation of independent predictors and comorbidity on stone-free rate and complications
|
|
91 |
Wang HH et al, 2012: Shock wave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopy: variation in surgical management of kidney stones at freestanding children's hospitals
|
|
92 |
Vaidyanathan S et al, 2012: Are urological procedures in tetraplegic patients safely performed without anesthesia? a report of three cases
|
|
93 |
Eker HE et al, 2012: IV paracetamol effect on propofol-ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL
|
|
94 |
Häcker A et al, 2012: [Controversy on lower pole stones: monitor or intervene?]
|
|
95 |
Zhou Y et al, 2012: Characteristics of the secondary bubble cluster produced by an electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripter
|
|
96 |
Yucel S et al, 2012: Complications and associated factors of pediatric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
|
|
97 |
Sorensen MD et al, 2012: Quantitative Assessment of Shockwave Lithotripsy Accuracy and the Effect of Respiratory Motion
|
|
98 |
D'Addessi A et al, 2012: Complications of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary stones: to know and to manage them-a review
|
|
99 |
Zekey F et al, 2012: Evaluation of the Impact of Shock Wave Lithotripsy on Kidneys Using a New Marker: How Do Neutrophil Gelatinese-associated Lypocalin Values Change After Shock Wave Lithotripsy?
|
|
100 |
Melzer A et al, 2012: The importance of physics to progress in medical treatment.
|
| |
|
JPAGE_CURRENT_OF_TOTAL |
