Ferraro PM et al, 2018: Shock-wave lithotripsy or ureterorenoscopy for renal stones?

Ferraro PM, Pinto F, Gambaro G.
Nefrologia, Urologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.

  7891 Aufrufe

Connors BA et al, 2018: Preliminary Report on Stone Breakage and Lesion Size Produced by a New Extracorporeal Electrohydraulic (Sparker Array) Discharge Device.

Connors BA, Schaefer RB, Gallagher JJ, Johnson CD, Li G, Handa RK, Evan AP.
Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN.
Phoenix Science and Technology, Goffstown, NH.
School of Physics, Northeast Normal University, Changchun, China.

  7830 Aufrufe

Yanaral F et al, 2018: Shock-wave Lithotripsy for Pediatric Patients: Which Nomogram Can Better Predict Postoperative Outcomes?

Yanaral F, Ozgor F, Savun M, Agbas A, Akbulut F, Sarilar O.
Department of Urology, Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

  7613 Aufrufe

Yuri P et al, 2018: Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).

Yuri P, Hariwibowo R, Soeroharjo I, Danarto R, Hendri AZ, Brodjonegoro SR, Rasyid N, Birowo P, Widyahening IS.
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Universitas Gadjah Mada - Sardjito Hospital, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.

  7596 Aufrufe

Geraghty RM et al, 2018: Ureteroscopy is more cost effective than shock wave lithotripsy for stone treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Geraghty RM, Jones P, Herrmann TRW, Aboumarzouk O, Somani BK.
Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Clinic of Urology, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland.
Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.

  8098 Aufrufe