Image not available

Hassan M et al, 2015: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs. extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for treating a 20-30 mm single renal pelvic stone.

Hassan M, El-Nahas AR, Sheir KZ, El-Tabey NA, El-Assmy AM, Elshal AM, Shokeir AA.
Urology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety and cost of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) for treating a 20-30 mm single renal pelvic stone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The computerised records of patients who underwent PNL or ESWL for a 20-30 mm single renal pelvic stone between January 2006 and December 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients aged <18 years who had a branched stone, advanced hydronephrosis, a solitary kidney, anatomical renal abnormality, or had a surgical intervention within the past 6 months were excluded. The study included 337 patients with a mean (SD, range) age of 49.3 (12.2, 20-81) years. The patients' criteria (age, sex, body mass index) and the stone characteristics (side, stone length, surface area, attenuation value and skin-to-stone distance) were compared between the groups. The re-treatment rate, the need for secondary procedures, success rate, complications and the total costs were calculated and compared.

RESULTS: In all, 167 patients were treated by ESWL and 170 by PNL. The re-treatment rate (75% vs. 5%), the need for secondary procedures (25% vs. 4.7%) and total number of procedures (three vs. one) were significantly higher in the ESWL group (P < 0.001). The success rate was significantly higher in the PNL group (95% vs. 75%, P < 0.001), as was the complication rate (13% vs. 6.6%, P = 0.050). The total costs of primary and secondary procedures were significantly higher for PNL (US$ 1120 vs. 490; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: PNL was more effective than ESWL for treating a single renal pelvic stone of 20-30 mm. However, ESWL was associated with fewer complications and a lower cost.

Arab J Urol. 2015 Sep;13(3):212-6. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 Jun 6. 

Rate this blog entry:
0
 

Comments 1

Peter Alken on Monday, 18 April 2016 12:53

This paper from a good institution on the treatment of single pelvic stones unfortunately is a retrospective study. Inclusion of data on costs is important and rarely done. “The cost of PNL for each patient was US$ 1,143 and for ESWL was US$ 357 for the first session and $70 for subsequent sessions. The cost of ureteroscopy was US$ 570 and of JJ ureteric stenting was US$ 285.” But the authors fail to indicate how the costs were evaluated and it is difficult to understand how the median cost for PNL of the whole series of 1120 US$ could be lower than the cost of 1143 US$ for a single patient.
See also: Wu H, Wang J, Lu J, Wang Y, Niu Z. Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy. Urol Int. 2015 Nov 10. They give hints on how to estimate the probability of ESWL success in larger stones.

This paper from a good institution on the treatment of single pelvic stones unfortunately is a retrospective study. Inclusion of data on costs is important and rarely done. “The cost of PNL for each patient was US$ 1,143 and for ESWL was US$ 357 for the first session and $70 for subsequent sessions. The cost of ureteroscopy was US$ 570 and of JJ ureteric stenting was US$ 285.” But the authors fail to indicate how the costs were evaluated and it is difficult to understand how the median cost for PNL of the whole series of 1120 US$ could be lower than the cost of 1143 US$ for a single patient. See also: Wu H, Wang J, Lu J, Wang Y, Niu Z. Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy. Urol Int. 2015 Nov 10. They give hints on how to estimate the probability of ESWL success in larger stones.
Guest
Monday, 21 August 2017
STORZ MEDICAL AG
Lohstampfestrasse 8
8274 Tägerwilen
Switzerland
Tel.: +41 (0)71 677 45 45
Fax: +41 (0)71 677 45 05

www.storzmedical.com
Personal data
Address
Contact data
Message